- The problem
- A useful chiropractic record tracks the course of care, the visit position within it, the remaining authorised visits and when care completed, and none of that exists by default. Operators define those per clinic and then cannot report across a client with three sites.
- Once it is loaded
- Plan type, visit number, visits remaining under authorisation, plan start and completion dates, referral source and preferred practitioner come configured, named identically across clinics and kept clear of anything that would make the record a clinical one.
- How it pays back
- Cross-site reporting is what a multi-clinic client actually pays a retainer for; if inconsistent fields cost you three hours per clinic to reconcile before a quarterly review, a shared field set is the difference between a report and an all-nighter.